New Delhi, November 2025 — The Supreme Court of India has once again underscored its commitment to minimizing judicial interference in arbitration, this time in a strong judgment that criticized the Patna High Court for revisiting an order that had already appointed an arbitrator in a commercial dispute. The judgment, delivered by a bench of Justices Pardiwala and Mahadevan, included an incisive remark: “Arbitration is often a friend in conferences but a foe in practice,” highlighting the tension between the theoretical benefits of arbitration and the hurdles it faces when parties resist or manipulate the process in reality.