Delhi High Court.
Trade Mark News Delhi High Court: New Delhi, December 1, 2025 — The Delhi High Court has granted interim relief to Allcargo Logistics Limited, restraining rival logistics firm VRS All Cargo Packers and Movers Pvt Ltd from using the mark “VRS ALLCARGO” and other deceptively similar variants. The court held that such use is likely to cause confusion among consumers and amounts to trademark infringement and passing off.
Justice Tejas Karia, in an order dated December 1, observed that the defendants’ adoption of “VRS ALLCARGO” prima facie infringed Allcargo’s long-standing and registered ALLCARGO trademarks and sought to unfairly capitalize on the plaintiff’s goodwill in the logistics sector.
Justice Tejas Karia, Delhi High Court.
The Delhi High Court noted that the defendants’ marks incorporate the word ALLCARGO in its entirety. With statutory protection secured across multiple classes, the plaintiff’s trademark enjoys recognition both as a standalone word mark and as part of its broader branding.
Finding a prima facie case in favor of Allcargo and that the balance of convenience lay with the plaintiff, the court restrained the defendants, their affiliates, and agents from using “VRS ALLCARGO” or any deceptively similar marks in relation to logistics services. The court also ordered the blocking of the defendants’ websites—www.vrsallcargopackers.com, www.vrsallcargopackers.in, and www.vrsallcargo.in—within 24 hours of receipt of the order.
READ: Trilegal Advises Digantara on $50 Million Series B Fundraise
Allcargo had contended that it has been using the ALLCARGO mark since the early 1990s in logistics and supply chain services. Its decades of continuous use, extensive promotional efforts, and significant revenues have created substantial distinctiveness, reputation, and goodwill, making the mark exclusively associated with its services.
Adv. Swathi Sukumar, Delhi High Court.
The court further observed that the impugned marks were visually, phonetically, structurally, and deceptively similar to Allcargo’s trademarks. This similarity, coupled with the overlap in services and marketing channels, was likely to confuse consumers of average intelligence and imperfect recollection, leading them to mistakenly associate the defendants’ services with Allcargo.
The matter has been listed for further hearing on March 17, 2026.
Legal Representation: Allcargo Logistics Limited was represented by Senior Advocate Swathi Sukumar, along with Advocates Himanshu Deora (Partner), Rishika Aggarwal, Sanat Saswadkar, Ritik Raghuwanshi, Murthy, and Pratibha Singh from King Stubb & Kasiva.
The defendants remained unrepresented despite being served.
READ: Non-Signatories Cannot Compel Arbitration, Supreme Court Rules in HPCL Case
