Meenakshi Natarajan Rajya Sabha Election Supreme Court Hearing News: In a significant legal blow to the opposition, the Supreme Court of India on Friday dismissed a petition filed by senior Congress leader Meenakshi Natarajan. The plea challenged the rejection of her nomination papers for the Rajya Sabha elections from Madhya Pradesh.
IAS Rohini Sindhuri vs IPS Roopa Moudgil Case in Supreme Court: In an unusual intervention aimed at protecting the integrity of the civil services, the Supreme Court of India has once again stepped in to halt a damaging and deeply personal legal battle between two of Karnataka’s most high-profile female officers.
Titled the Draft Regulations for Use of Artificial Intelligence in Courts, 2026, the framework establishes a rigorous “human-in-the-loop” philosophy. While it proactively embraces automation to clear India’s notoriously backlogged dockets, it draws a stark, unyielding line between administrative assistance and the sacred, uniquely human act of adjudication.
Latest Supreme Court Case Law on Hindus Succession Act of 1956: In a landmark judgment delivering profound clarity to Hindu property law, the Supreme Court of India has brought an end to a 50-year-old family feud. In doing so, the apex court drawing a sharp, irreversible line between traditional Hindu coparcenary law and modern statutory inheritance.
NEW DELHI — In a swift legislative maneuver aimed at tackling the relentless pendency of cases in India’s highest judiciary, President Droupadi Murmu has promulgated a major constitutional ordinance. The directive officially increases the sanctioned strength of the Supreme Court from 34 to 38 judges, marking the first structural expansion of the apex court’s bench in seven years.
New Delhi — The Supreme Court of India on Thursday clarified the scope of participation by multi-state co-operative societies in insolvency proceedings, ruling that such entities can submit resolution plans under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) only if their bye-laws expressly permit the investment and the target entity operates in the “same line of business.”
In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court of India has quashed the proceedings against an alleged gangster, Gabbar Singh, under the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, due to severe procedural irregularities in the preparation and submission of the Gang Chart. The Court emphasized that when the law mandates a particular procedure, it must be followed to the letter, particularly in cases where an individual’s personal liberty is at stake.
New Delhi (March 20, 2026): The Supreme Court of India has directed all states and Union Territories (UTs) to submit detailed affidavits about the current condition of prisons, with a particular focus on overcrowding and the steps being taken to address the issue. The bench, consisting of Justice Vikram Nath and Justice Sandeep Mehta, passed…
A Bench comprising CJI Surya Kant and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and Vipul Pancholi flagged systemic issues in tribunal functioning, including lack of accountability and concerns regarding members outsourcing judgment writing.
Chief Justice of India Surya Kant on Thursday vowed to undertake reforms within the Supreme Court Registry after discovering that a petition previously dismissed by a three-judge Bench was listed again before another Bench.
In a significant procedural departure, the Supreme Court of India has agreed to hear in open court the review petitions challenging its landmark ruling mandating three years of law practice for entry into judicial service.
The Oudh Bar Association has written to Chief Justice of India Surya Kant expressing serious concern over what it described as “stigmatic and demoralising” remarks made by the Supreme Court against a judge of the Allahabad High Court.
Supreme Court Guidelines 2026 for Senior Advocate Designation: The Supreme Court of India has notified fresh norms governing the designation of Senior Advocates, titled “Guidelines for Designation of Senior Advocates by the Supreme Court of India, 2026.” The new framework replaces the 2023 guidelines in line with the Court’s judgment in Jitender @ Kalla v. State of NCT of Delhi.
A Family Court judge in Delhi, Harish Kumar, has approached the Supreme Court challenging personal remarks made against him by the Delhi High Court while setting aside one of his divorce judgments. The matter arose from a case in the Patiala House Courts where Kumar, then a Family Court judge, granted divorce by treating cross-petitions for dissolution as deemed consent under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act (HMA), rather than adjudicating them on contested grounds.
A lawyer has moved the Supreme Court challenging provisions of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) that allow serving or retired judicial officers to be appointed as heads of prosecution offices under State governments. The petition, filed by advocate Subeesh PS, targets Section 20(2)(a) and 20(2)(b) of the BNSS.
The Allahabad High Court Bar Association (HCBA) has urged Bar Associations across India to oppose the proposal requiring High Courts to function on two Saturdays each month. In a letter dated January 27, 2026, the HCBA flagged concerns about the impact of additional court days on lawyers, judges, and staff, and questioned whether longer hours would meaningfully reduce case backlogs.
Supreme Court Police Media Briefing Manual: New Delhi, January 21, 2026 – The Supreme Court has directed all States to formulate a formal policy governing police media briefings, relying on a comprehensive “Police Manual for Media Briefing” submitted before it by Senior Advocate Gopal Sankaranarayanan, who appeared as amicus curiae in the matter. The Court has given the States three months to implement the directive.
Justice Yashwant Varma Impeachment News: The Supreme Court has rejected a plea filed by Allahabad High Court Justice Yashwant Varma seeking to quash impeachment proceedings initiated against him, clearing the way for a parliamentary probe into allegations of corruption linked to unaccounted cash found at his residence. A Bench comprising Justice Dipankar Datta and Justice…
Supreme Court Guidelines on Oral Arguments by Advocates: New Delhi: In a significant move aimed at streamlining judicial proceedings, the Supreme Court has introduced a new Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) mandating lawyers to specify in advance the time they intend to take for oral arguments and to adhere strictly to those timelines.
Unnao Rape Case News Supreme Court: New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday stayed the operation of a recent Delhi High Court order that had granted bail and suspended the life sentence awarded to former Uttar Pradesh MLA Kuldeep Singh Sengar in the Unnao rape case, citing serious legal concerns that warranted closer examination.
Supreme Court Aravalli Hills Case News: New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday stayed its recent judgment on the Aravalli Hills, saying that certain clarifications were necessary regarding the definitions it had approved last month. The Court also decided to constitute a new committee of experts to study the environmental impact of the recommendations made by an earlier panel, which was largely comprised of bureaucrats.
Supreme Court Unnao Rape Case Kuldeep Singh Sengar: New Delhi: The Supreme Court will hold a special sitting during its winter vacation on December 29 to hear the Central Bureau of Investigation’s (CBI) appeal challenging the suspension of the life sentence granted to former Uttar Pradesh MLA Kuldeep Singh Sengar in the Unnao rape case.
Supreme Court Delhi Air Pollution Aravalli Hills Definition: New Delhi: The Supreme Court has initiated a suo motu case to address long-standing issues concerning the definition of the Aravalli Hills and ranges, a move aimed at bringing uniformity to environmental protection and mining regulation across states.
Supreme Court Case Law on Gratuity Payments in India: New Delhi, December 9, 2025 — The Supreme Court on Monday delivered a significant ruling clarifying the legal distinction between resignation and voluntary retirement, holding that resignation leads to forfeiture of pensionary benefits, while gratuity remains a statutory entitlement even after resignation.
Supreme Court News: New Delhi: In a significant step aimed at streamlining criminal trials and preventing avoidable delays, the Supreme Court has directed that every chargesheet, challan and final report filed in criminal cases must clearly disclose whether any cross-case or other related case arising from the same incident is pending.
AI-Based Resolution of Cheque Bounce Cases Feasible, Says Ex-CJI Justice Chandrachud: New Delhi, India – Former Chief Justice of India, Justice DY Chandrachud, has suggested that artificial intelligence (AI) could be used to resolve certain categories of litigation, particularly cheque dishonour cases, as part of efforts to address India’s growing judicial pendency. Speaking at the IBA Litigation and ADR Symposium on Saturday, Justice Chandrachud highlighted the potential of AI in accelerating the adjudication of transactional disputes without compromising fairness.
Supreme Court’s New Rules for Mentioning, Adjournment and Urgent Listing: New Delhi, India – November 2025 – In a significant move to streamline the judicial process, the Supreme Court of India has announced a set of new procedural rules that will come into effect on Monday, December 1, 2025. These rules aim to overhaul the procedures for urgent case listings, adjournment requests, and the oral mentioning of matters before the Court, bringing greater transparency, consistency, and predictability to the system.
AI Could Resolve 60% of India’s Litigation Backlog: Justice Manmohan: New Delhi, India – November 29, 2025 – The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into India’s judicial process could revolutionize the country’s legal system, with AI potentially resolving more than 60 percent of litigation by automating routine, small-ticket cases. This ambitious prediction was made by Supreme Court Justice Manmohan during his keynote address at the India Law, AI, and Tech Summit 2025 held in Delhi on Saturday.
A Bench of Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi, which is hearing a suo motu case on the issue, called for stringent and coordinated action by central and state agencies to curb the growing menace.
Kochi, November 3, 2025: A group of 201 practising lawyers in Kerala have moved a resolution before the Kerala High Court Advocates’ Association (KHCAA) opposing the recent Supreme Court judgment in Rejanish KV v. K Deepa & Ors, which allows judicial officers with prior experience as lawyers to be considered for appointment as District Judges under the Bar quota.
Explained: Why Every Lawyer Is Not an Advocate: The Supreme Court recently declared that in-house lawyers are not “advocates” under the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA), interpreting a clause on professional privilege — it revisited a core distinction within India’s legal profession: the line between having a law degree and having the right to practise law.…
Justice Surya Kant – Next Chief Justice of India: New Delhi, October 31, 2025 — In a significant development on Thursday, the Central government officially cleared the appointment of Supreme Court Justice Surya Kant as the next Chief Justice of India (CJI). The appointment will take effect from November 24, 2025, following the retirement of the current CJI, BR Gavai, on November 23.
Supreme Court of India News: The Bench, comprising Justice Sanjay Karol and Justice PK Mishra, observed that each word in a judgment carries immense weight and that the true meaning and spirit of the original language must be faithfully conveyed in English for appellate courts to properly understand what transpired in the lower courts.
New Delhi, 18 October 2025. The Supreme Court of India has expressed serious concern over the alarming backlog of execution petitions, which has now reached a staggering 8.8 lakh cases. Despite earlier directions to expedite their disposal, the Court observed that the situation remains “highly disappointing” and “alarming,” with execution petitions continuing to pile up across the country.
Bench Directs Mandatory Registration With Revenue Authorities, Escrow Accounts for Pre-Construction Funds, and Affidavits for Risky Contracts
Supreme Court Clarifies Difference Between Murder and Attempt to Murder: In a ruling with profound implications for how homicide cases are tried in India, the Supreme Court has clarified that the mere passage of time between an injury and the victim’s eventual death does not reduce the culpability of the accused from murder to attempt to murder.
Supreme Court Orders Urgent Filling of NCLT-NCLAT Vaccancies: New Delhi: In a landmark ruling aimed at fortifying India’s regulatory framework and protecting the interests of homebuyers, the Supreme Court of India has directed the Union Government to fill vacancies at the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) and the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) “on a war-footing.”
Supreme Court Case Laws and Guidelines for Deciding Bail Matters: New Delhi: In a significant ruling aimed at safeguarding the fundamental right to liberty, the Supreme Court of India has directed High Courts and trial courts to decide regular and anticipatory bail applications expeditiously, preferably within two months of filing. Prolonged Delays Impinge on Fundamental Rights, Justices Pardiwala and Mahadevan noted in the order.
Case Laws against false rape complaints: Supreme Court Lays Four-Step Test to Identify Frivolous Criminal Complaints: In a landmark decision, the Supreme Court has quashed a false rape case that was lodged on the false promise of marriage, asserting that continuing with the criminal proceedings would amount to a severe abuse of the legal process. The case, Pradeep Kumar Kesarwani v. The State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr., saw a Bench comprising Justice JB Pardiwala and Justice Sandeep Mehta set down a crucial four-step test to guide High Courts when considering requests to quash frivolous or vexatious criminal complaints.
Supreme Court News: SC Clarifies Scope of Review Jurisdiction, Reaffirms It Cannot Be an Appeal in Disguise: New Delhi, September 8, 2025 — The Supreme Court, in a significant ruling on Monday, laid down clear guidelines on the scope of review jurisdiction, reinforcing that review petitions are not meant to function as appeals in disguise. The Court reiterated that the purpose of a review petition under Order 47 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) is limited to addressing clear errors on the face of the record, and should not be confused with an appeal, which involves a more comprehensive reassessment of the case.
Supreme Court Clarifies Home Buyers’ Rights in Insolvency Proceedings: New Delhi, September 9, 2025 — In a landmark judgment, the Supreme Court on Tuesday held that homebuyers cannot be denied possession of their flats if their claims have been verified and admitted by the Resolution Professional (RP) in an insolvency resolution process. The Court emphasized that once a claim is duly verified, it cannot be treated as “belated” or downgraded merely due to delayed filing.
Supreme Court Raises Alarm Over Delay in Uploading Judgments by High Courts: New Delhi, September 9, 2025 — The Supreme Court has expressed grave concern over the persistent delays by High Courts in uploading detailed judgments on their websites, despite having pronounced the operative parts of the verdicts months or even years earlier. The apex court’s remarks came in a recent case, Rajan v. State of Haryana, highlighting the adverse impact such delays have on litigants seeking timely judicial redress.
Supreme Court Directs Election Commission to Include Aadhaar as a Valid ID Proof in Bihar Electoral Roll Revision: New Delhi, September 2025 – In a crucial development that is set to shape the ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Bihar, the Supreme Court of India has directed the Election Commission of India (ECI) to formally recognize Aadhaar as a valid proof of identity for inclusion in the state’s voter list. This ruling, issued on Monday, extends the scope of Aadhaar as an identity document, which was initially only applicable to voters facing exclusion due to discrepancies in the electoral roll.
Supreme Court Puts Hold on Five-Decade-Old Royal Property Case Involving Saif Ali Khan and Family: NEW DELHI – In a significant development for one of India’s most prominent royal families, the Supreme Court has stayed a Madhya Pradesh High Court order that sought to reopen a decades-old partition dispute over the personal estate of the Nawab of Bhopal. The ruling offers a temporary reprieve to Bollywood actor Saif Ali Khan and his family, whose inheritance of the estimated ₹15,000 crore property had been thrown into uncertainty.
Supreme Court Cracks Down on ‘Optional’ Enrolment Fees, Reaffirms Statutory Cap for Aspiring Lawyers: NEW DELHI – In a significant move to ensure affordability and accessibility to the legal profession, the Supreme Court of India has issued a stern directive to all State Bar Councils, clarifying that they cannot collect any amount as “optional fees” from aspiring lawyers during the enrolment process. The bench of Justices J.B. Pardiwala and R. Mahadevan made it unequivocally clear that the enrolment fee must strictly adhere to the statutory limits prescribed by the Advocates Act, 1961.
Supreme Court Refuses Media Gag in Dharmasthala Case, Cites Dangers of ‘Super Injunctions’:
NEW DELHI — In a robust defense of press freedom, the Supreme Court of India has refused to impose a media gag order in the controversial Dharmasthala Temple mass burials case. The apex court, while directing a trial court in Karnataka to re-examine the temple administration’s plea, made it clear that such “super injunctions” are a rare measure that can “stifle free speech.”
Supreme Court Upholds Judicial Inquiry, Dismisses Justice Varma’s Challenge: NEW DELHI — In a landmark decision affecting judicial accountability, the Supreme Court of India on Thursday dismissed a petition filed by Allahabad High Court Justice Yashwant Varma. The petition challenged the findings of an in-house inquiry committee and the subsequent recommendation for his removal, which stemmed from the discovery of unaccounted cash at his official residence. The apex court, in a ruling delivered by a bench of Justices Dipankar Datta and AG Masih, held that both the constitution of the committee and the procedure it followed were not illegal, reinforcing the legal sanctity of the in-house mechanism for addressing judicial misconduct.
Supreme Court Refers Key Motor Accident Compensation Issue to Larger Bench: New Delhi – The Supreme Court has referred a crucial legal question concerning motor accident compensation to a larger bench, a move that could significantly impact how claims are handled for the death of a vehicle owner. The Court is examining whether a deceased vehicle owner’s legal heirs can claim “no-fault” compensation under Section 163A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, even if the accident did not involve a third-party vehicle.
Supreme Court Reinstates Environmental Clearance for Industrial, Educational Buildings: New Delhi – In a significant judgment for environmental protection, the Supreme Court today struck down a government notification that had exempted industrial sheds, schools, colleges, and other educational institutions from the requirement of obtaining prior environmental clearance.
Supreme Court “Shocked”, Strips Allahabad High Court Judge Justice Prashant Kumar of Criminal Roster: New Delhi – In an extraordinary move, the Supreme Court has come down heavily on an Allahabad High Court judge, ordering that he be immediately stripped of his criminal roster. The apex court was “shocked” by the judge’s reasoning in a judgment that suggested criminal prosecution could be an acceptable alternative for recovering money in a civil matter.
Supreme Court Recalls its Liquidation Order for Bhushan Power, JSW Resolution Plan to be Considered Afresh: In a significant development, the Supreme Court of India on Thursday recalled its controversial May 2 judgment that had rejected JSW Steel’s ₹19,700 crore resolution plan for Bhushan Power and Steel Ltd (BPSL) and ordered its liquidation. The Court’s decision marks a turning point in the protracted insolvency saga surrounding the troubled steel company, with fresh scrutiny set to be given to the resolution plan.
Supreme Court Urges Inclusion of Aadhaar in Bihar Electoral Roll Revision Process: New Delhi, India – July 28, 2025 — The Supreme Court of India on Monday urged the Election Commission of India (ECI) to consider including the Aadhaar card as an acceptable document for the ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Bihar, ahead of the upcoming State Assembly elections.
A Five-judge Constitution Bench of Supreme Court to Hear Presidential Reference on Governor’s Assent to Bills: New Delhi, India – July 19, 2025 – The Supreme Court of India is set to hear a crucial Presidential Reference under Article 143 of the Constitution on July 22, addressing fundamental questions surrounding the grant of assent to Bills by Governors and the President. This significant hearing comes in the wake of the Supreme Court’s own judgment in the Tamil Nadu Governor’s case, which had imposed timelines for such decisions, sparking a constitutional debate.
Supreme Court Imposes ₹10 Lakh Cost on Builder’s Agent for Misusing Criminal Law to Force Sale of Property: New Delhi, India – In a stern rebuke against the misuse of criminal law, the Supreme Court of India on July 18 imposed exemplary costs of ₹10,00,000 (Ten Lakh Rupees) on a complainant for filing a false…
Supreme Court Refuses Lalu Yadav’s Plea to Stay Land-for-Job Scam Trial: New Delhi, India (July 18, 2025) – The Supreme Court of India on Friday declined to entertain Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) Chief Lalu Prasad Yadav’s plea seeking a stay on trial court proceedings in the alleged land-for-job scam case. Yadav had challenged the Delhi High Court’s earlier refusal to halt the trial, but the apex court has now directed the High Court to expeditiously decide the main petition for quashing the CBI case.
Bombay High Court Upholds UAPA Validity, Clarifies ‘Prevention’ Not Preventive Detention Law: Mumbai, India – In a significant ruling that clarifies the nature of India’s stringent anti-terror legislation, the Bombay High Court on Thursday upheld the Constitutional validity of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA). A Bench of Justices AS Gadkari and Neela Gokhale firmly stated that despite the word “prevention” appearing in its title, the UAPA is not a preventive detention law.
Supreme Court Warns: Lack of Special NIA Courts Delaying Trials, May Force Bail in Terror Cases:
New Delhi, India – The Supreme Court of India today expressed strong disapproval over the government’s failure to establish an adequate number of special courts dedicated to trying terror-related offenses under the National Investigation Agency (NIA) Act. A Bench of Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi warned that the dearth of such courts is causing undue delays in trials, which could compel courts to grant bail to undertrials in cases where proceedings are not expeditious.
Kanwar Yatra: Plea in Supreme Court Challenges UP Government’s QR Code Mandate for Eateries: New Delhi, India – An application has been filed before the Supreme Court challenging a directive by the Uttar Pradesh government that mandates the display of QR codes at eateries along the route of the Kanwar Yatra. These QR codes, when scanned, are designed to reveal the names of the shop owners, a measure that petitioners argue constitutes discriminatory profiling previously stayed by the apex court.
Don’t Hide Your Mental Health Issues: CJI BR Gavai to Law Students: HYDERABAD, INDIA – In a candid and compassionate address to the graduating class of NALSAR University of Law, Chief Justice of India Justice B.R. Gavai delivered a powerful message urging young lawyers to confront the emotional and structural challenges inherent in the legal profession, emphasizing the critical importance of mental health and self-care. His remarks, delivered at the university’s 22nd Convocation, resonated deeply, offering both a stark reality check and an uplifting call to foster a more supportive legal community.
Advocate Shwetasree Majumdar Withdraws Consent for Judgeship Amidst Centre’s Inaction: New Delhi, India – July 5, 2025 – In a development that highlights ongoing concerns regarding delays in judicial appointments, prominent intellectual property rights advocate Shwetasree Majumdar has withdrawn her consent for appointment as a judge of the Delhi High Court. Her decision comes after the Union Government reportedly kept the Supreme Court Collegium’s recommendation of her name pending for nearly a year.
No Insurance for Legal Heirs if Driver Caused Accident by Rash Driving: Supreme Court: New Delhi, India – July 5, 2025 – In a significant ruling that clarifies the scope of motor vehicle insurance liability, the Supreme Court of India has held that insurance companies are not obligated to pay compensation to the legal heirs of a deceased person if the accident was solely caused by the deceased’s own rash and negligent driving. This decision reinforces the principle that a “self-tortfeasor” cannot claim indemnification through their own insurance for their own fault.
Former CJI D.Y. Chandrachud Urges Ban on Retrospective Tax Amendments: Mumbai, India – July 5, 2025 – Former Chief Justice of India (CJI) D.Y. Chandrachud today delivered a powerful address, advocating for a permanent cessation of retrospective tax amendments and a comprehensive overhaul of India’s legal and regulatory framework. Speaking at the centenary celebrations of the Chamber of Tax Consultants in Mumbai, Justice Chandrachud emphasized that such reforms are crucial for India to achieve its ambitious goal of becoming a $10 trillion economy.
Contractual Prosecutors Cannot Claim Regularisation, says Supreme Court: New Delhi, India – July 5, 2025 – The Supreme Court of India has firmly ruled that public prosecutors appointed on a contractual basis cannot claim regularisation of their services. A bench comprising Justice Sandeep Mehta and Justice Joymalya Bagchi upheld a decision by the Calcutta High Court, which had rejected a writ application seeking directions for regularisation by a Public Prosecutor.
Yogendra Yadav Challenges Bihar Voter Roll Revision in Supreme Court: NEW DELHI, July 5, 2025 – In a critical legal challenge ahead of Bihar’s upcoming Assembly elections, prominent psephologist and politician Yogendra Yadav has moved the Supreme Court, filing a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) under Article 32 of the Constitution. The petition directly targets the Election Commission of India’s (ECI) “Special Intensive Revision” (SIR) of electoral rolls, expressing grave apprehension that the process could lead to the large-scale disenfranchisement of voters across the state.
UU Lalit, Sanjiv Khanna and I have Tried to Change the Perception that Supreme Court is not just CJI’s Court: CJI BR Gavi: Nagpur, India – June 30, 2025 – Chief Justice of India (CJI) B.R. Gavai, speaking at a felicitation event organized by the High Court Bar Association of Nagpur, his home bar, on…
Supreme Court Slams UP Government For Not Releasing Man Despite Bail, Imposes Rs 5 Lakh Fine: India’s Supreme Court has strongly criticized jail officials in Uttar Pradesh. They delayed the release of a man granted bail. The court has ordered the state government to pay him ₹5 lakh (about $6,000 USD). The accused was granted…
Justice Dipankar Datta Urges Stern Action Against “External Forces” Impeding Collegium Recommendations: Nagpur – Supreme Court judge Justice Dipankar Datta on Saturday called for a resolute approach against “external forces” that obstruct the implementation of Collegium recommendations for judicial appointments, while simultaneously emphasizing the need for fairness and transparency in the appointment process. Justice Datta’s…
Refrain from Staying the Conviction of Public Servants in Corruption Cases, says Supreme Court: India’s highest court has reiterated a clear stance: courts should generally not pause the conviction of public servants found guilty of corruption. This observation came as the Supreme Court dismissed a petition. The petition challenged a Gujarat High Court decision. That…
Enforcement Directorate (ED) Notice to Advocates: New Delhi – India’s Supreme Court has raised a fundamental question about the independence of the legal profession. It has put a temporary stop to the Gujarat Police summoning a lawyer for questioning in a criminal case involving his client. The Court highlighted that forcing lawyers to appear before…
Supreme Court of India Issues New Guidelines for Record Keeping: India’s top court has set new rules. They aim to make its record keeping better. This will bring more accountability. It will also improve efficiency. Chief Justice of India B.R. Gavai spoke about the changes. He said the court’s offices have more records now. There…
The Supreme Court on Tuesday directed an army commando, convicted under Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code (dowry death), to surrender before the authorities within two weeks. A Bench of Justices Ujjal Bhuyan and K Vinod Chandran rejected his plea for exemption from surrendering during pendency of his appeal and also rejected his argument…
Supreme Court to Frame Guidelines for Issue of OBC Certificate for Children of Single Mothers: New Delhi – The Supreme Court of India is poised to frame comprehensive guidelines concerning the issuance of Other Backward Class (OBC) certificates to children raised by single mothers. A key aspect of this deliberation will be to address the…
Supreme Court Pulls Up Registry for Delay in Listing of Pending Bail Matters: New Delhi – India’s Supreme Court has told its own administrative body, the Registry, to speed up cases involving bail. The Court said such cases, known as special leave petitions (SLPs) for bail, should not be left pending for too long without…
CJI BR Gavai Criticizes Bulldozer Justice: The executive cannot become judge, jury and executioner, Chief Justice of India (CJI) BR Gavai said earlier this week while highlighting the Supreme Court’s ruling against retributive demolition of private properties by government authorities in India. “More recently, the Court in Re: Directions in the matter of demolition of…
Emergency era verdict by Supreme Court was ‘darkest’ in judicial history: Vice President Dhankhar: Supreme Court of India’s emergency-era judgment was the darkest in judicial history, Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar said on Friday. Dhankhar said that during times of crisis, people turn to the judiciary for protection. However, the Supreme Court of India declined to…